| |
 |
Impositions
/ Setts
Jun 10 Jul 10
Cheryl
Pagurek, Barbara Lounder
Opening
Thurs, Jun 10, 6-8
Where
visual symbols have been employed in an effort to paralyze the mind, they
are here used as a means of energizing it.
Marshall McLuhan, The Mechanical Bride.

Cheryl
Pagurek, Box of Garbage Bags, 2002
The works of Barbara Lounder and Cheryl Pagurek converge through the theme
of pattern. Patterns of design, patterns of society, patterns of appropriation,
patterns of tradition, patterns of time, patterns of lineage, and patterns
of industry are conceptualized to inform the past, present, and future.
Setts & Impositions asks us to re-shape our thinking about
established patterns, whether they are physical or intellectual. Examining
two designsthe flamboyant tartan and its associate histories, and
the detritus of our society in the form of commercial patternsthese
works offer us alternate perspectives on cultures and on ourselves as
cultural consumers.
Lounders Setts playfully manipulates the chequered and duplicitous
history of tartanone of the most identifiable signifiers of Scottishness.
To obtain a plaid, the coloured threads of warp and weft of the square
mirror the section next to it in length and width, creating a new hue
wherever bands of the different colours cross. The selected colour combinations
are assembled in setts. Setts/tartan/plaid patterns were originally a
matter of personal taste. Bonnie Prince Charlie wore Highland plaid and
kilt fighting the British in the Jacobite wars. The powerful association
of plaid with rebellion was such that after the Battle of Culloden, the
British passed The Disarming Act of 1746 outlawing the wearing of Highland
dress (i.e. plaid) making it punishable by imprisonment and deportation.
By the late 18th century, when the lower class had abandoned the plaid,
the upper and middle classes began to adopt it, establishing the link
between sett and clan. In 1822, the combination of King George IVs
visit to Scotland and Queen Victorias Balmoralism created a veritable
craze for wearing tartan, and the kilt came to signify patriotism. The
Highland regiments, exempted from the tartan ban, offered a further heroic
image of tartan with their conquests in India and America. By the late
19th century, tartan was fused to a lucrative commerce, which continues
to create new designs that are worn "with tribal enthusiasm, by Scots
and supposed Scots from Texas to Tokyo." 1
The discovery that her surname, Lounder, is a Scottish verb meaning to
punch or bludgeonactions associated with overt masculinitieshas
been deployed to question and, at times, to feminize a patrilineal Scottish
icon tartan. Setts tartan-ized installation wall, complete
with packages of various Scottish brand goods, questions the
cultural power of tartan that forges global Scottish kinship. The literature
juxtaposed with these products recalls the history and sources for Setts.
Together, these elements constitute a no-name brand of tartan and Scottishness,
which calls into question its own authenticity.

Barbara
Lounder, Setts, detail
The final stage in the cottage production of tartan, called waulking
or stretching the cloth, was traditionally womens work and was often
accompanied by singing, joking, and impromptu verses. The artist continues
this tradition by applying texts to form a Lounder word-sett onto tartan.
The virile male symbol of the tartan kilt has been described "[I]n
its bare essence as
nothing but a loin-cloth
a primitive garment,"2
that represents the base meaning of Lounder. Using her surname as a mesostic,
each text block contains a column of letters spelling out LOUNDER. She
then crosses it in with snatches of Sir Walter Scotts gothic bloodlust
works (that helped to secure Scottish national identity in the mid 19th
century), and with loutish words from the modern detective novels of Ian
Rankin (whose writings have again popularized Scotland and made fashionable
the rough edged characters, cities and landscape). The textual warp and
weft underscores the mix of historic Scottish truths and half-truths,
that are subverted for the dominant blue and red LOUNDER word-sett.
The tartan garments that serve as the ground for embellishment are degraded
versions of Scottish national dress. The ancient masculine unstructured
belted plaid has evolved into a formal kilt with sewn pleats, and has
even been co-opted as womens dress. The kilts applied with the LOUNDER
word-setts are ambiguous in their gender. Does a tartan button (a button
on a kilt?!) imply feminine origins and does this repudiate the lore that
you should not wear your mothers tartan? If so, how can it ever
be reconciled with LOUNDERs warrior word-sett? Yet perhaps the final
comment on the rugged Scot in his unsewn plaid is realized by the four-in-hand
ties that attempt to transfer the glamour and power of tartan into the
confines of the constructed and sewn bias-cut tie. Can the man in
the grey flannel suit truly resemble the kilted and bare-legged
Scot? The untied and disheveled images of the tartan ties suggest that
the executive is letting loose and casting off his formal (British?) self
for a new roguish Scot whose "mortal grapple [can be] overthrown."
(Sir Walter Scott)
Just as Lounder uses found tartans as a field for exploration, Pagurek
appropriates pre-made commercial patterns for packaging, sewing, and paper
toys for her templates. Using an assortment of stencils as guides, she
cuts shapes out of existing photographs according to the requirements
of the pattern. Here, areas of the photograph literally fall off the page
and are gone, thereby destabilizing the original image and recording a
new one. By permitting the pattern to dominate, Pagurek confronts and
undermines the photographic record. As a result, the viewer is required
to unpack the image on several levels; to decipher the partially cut-out
photograph by recalling photographic tropes, and to recall the types of
objects that would BE related to such shapes. Thus the photograph itself
represents the lost image and the pattern the lost object.The easily identifiable
shapes of Sewing Pattern 1 (dress) and Sewing Pattern 2
(trousers) dominate over the photographs of children who remain invisible
behind the patterned conventions of form and gender. Other industrial
patterns that are difficult to decipher are rudely stamped across photographs
of scenes that document highly charged moments of emotional complexity
that are hard to reconcile and situate. Garden Hose Packaging substantially
erases a romantic, loving moment and Pantyhose Packaging screens
a funeral, a time of grief. Both leave one speculating about the lost
image and emotion as well as the pattern form itself and what it once
contained.
Barbara Lounder,
Setts (Ancient Wilson tartan with text excerpted from a poem by Sir
Walter Scott), detail
The juxtaposition
of unrecognizable with readily identifiable patterns echoes back and forth
in Impositions and amplifies the surprise of both. A tissue box
we realize has its own iconic pattern that makes an abstracted serrated
oval form indisputably recognizable as the ubiquitous Kleenex boxa
sign of civilization and comfort. Though the pattern of the package obliterates
any identifiable individuals and the various moments of intimacy in these
works, the commodification of such common objects makes them part of a
cultural bond (here represented by a Kleenex box, horrifying as that may
seem). Box of 4 Wineglasses recognizes our shared activity of flattening
boxes for the recycling box. It is this action that binds us and that
enables this shape to be understood. The promise of cheer and companionship
in the missing wine glasses becomes squashed and relegated to the debris
that we partially see depicted.
The duplicity of historic time and the nature of photography itself is
expressed and questioned in the images of families and friends. Photographic
records are de-personalized as the patterns re-focus and shift the images,
not only the actual historic record, but also the intention of the original
record. As Barbara Bender has suggested, an "alternative history
attempts to demote or undermine aspects of contemporary social relations
. . . . Ideological representations are integral to relations of power
and control."3 Pagurek offers us new
pictures in order to create new histories, but ones with vestiges and
proof of the past. This is clearly expressed in works such as Box of
Garbage Bags and Paper Toy Pattern 3, where Pagurek isolates
individuals from a group setting that they never expected to leave, and
in so doing reformats their status and power.

Cheryl Pagurek,
Garden Hose Packaging, 2002
Conversely, blocking out, as in Video Tape Sleeve, protects the
subjects from an anonymous prying gaze, as there is no means of seeing
behind or around the obstruction of the imposed pattern. Here the missing
centres of pictures act as a viewing hole reminiscent of a peep show;
but the voyeur is disabled and cannot fully access a private image that
is blasted through. The newly constituted photographic record is hung
on a wall and creates a shadow of its missing part, a vestigial memory
of the cast-aside image. The view goes no where except to the white wall,
that resonates with absence and loss. The new image, however, can be re-cast,
signaling a future if hung on different coloured walls, on wallpapered
walls or possibly over other hung images. It holds potential.
Patterns and images traditionally unite us with our past, and can conjure
moments that were experiencedreal or imagined. They fill in blanks.
In their patterns Lounder and Pagurek each address what is missing by
deploying the common place, the evident and the well recorded. Setts
& Impositions questions the veracity of patterns of history that,
like dreams, are formed to suit our requirements and fantasies of past
and recent time, and project hope into an imaginable future.
--Alexander Palmer
1
Hugh Trevor-Roper, "The Highland Tradition of Scotland," The
Invention of Tradition. Eds. Eric Hobsbawn and Terence Granger (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1983), 41.
2 H.F. McClintock, Old Irish and Highland
Dress (Dundalk: Dundalgan Press, 1943), 166.
3 Barbara Bender, "The Roots of Inequality,"
Design and Aesthetics; a Reader. Eds Jerry Palmer and Mo Dodson (New York
and London: Routledge, 1996), 190.
Cheryl Pagurek received a BFA from
Queen's University (1990) and an MFA from the University of Victoria (1992).
She has shown her installations, sculpture and photography in solo, two-person,
and group exhibits across Canada. Recent exhibits include shows at the
Carleton University Art Gallery (Ottawa), SAW (Ottawa), the Ottawa Art
Gallery, Vu Centre de diffusion et de production de la photographie (Quebec)
and Eastern Edge (St. John's). Other exhibits include those at Open Space
(Victoria), the Art Gallery of Greater Victoria, TRUCK (Calgary), Floating
Gallery (Winnipeg), Agnes Etherington Art Centre (Kingston), Hamilton
Artists Inc., Gallery 101 (Ottawa), la Centrale (Montreal) and WKP Kennedy
Gallery (North Bay). She has work in the collections of the Canada Council
Art Bank, the Library of the National Gallery of Canada, the Ottawa Art
Gallery and the City of Ottawa. She lives and works in Ottawa, and gratefully
acknowledges the financial support of the Ontario Arts Council and the
City of Ottawa for the creation of Impositions.
Barbara Lounder is a Nova Scotia artist,
currently living in Dartmouth. She has been exhibiting for over twenty
years, with her work featured in group and solo shows across Canada, the
United States, Poland, Germany and New Zealand. Barbara Lounders
artwork is in the collections of The Canada Council Art Bank, the Nova
Scotia Art Bank, Carleton University, Saint Marys University Art
Gallery, the Art Gallery of Nova Scotia, and the Department of Foreign
Affairs. She is the recipient of a number of awards and grants. Currently,
she is Dean at the Nova Scotia College of Art and Design, where she has
been on the teaching staff since 1986. The artist wishes to acknowledge
the generous financial support of the Nova Scotia Department of Tourism
and Culture
Alexandra Palmer (PhD) is the Nora
E. Vaughan Fashion Costume Curator in the Textile section, Royal Ontario
Museum. She is also adjunct faculty, Graduate Programme in Art History,
York University and Art History, University of Toronto. She has curated
and published extensively on fashion history.

|